The radical differences between the Islam cult and other religions needs to be taught at western schools . The next generations need to understand that this is an aggressive, cancerous , perverted cult that needs to be controlled and isolated . Future generations need to instruct muslims that they need to give allegiance to the country they reside in - if they prefer to commit to sharia they must leave .
That is a lot more than food though Paul, that's halal vacations, nail polish, finance, clothing etc - it's an enormous industry at this point and it all contributes to zakat, hence to jihad and Islamization of the West
It's interesting that as soon as someone becomes an 'ex-Muslim,' neither Islamic nor Western authorities consider them Muslim or take their warnings seriously. This implies that 'race' is effectively defined by adherence to and practice of sharia—a political and legal ideology.
By this logic, we could just as easily talk about a 'Liberal race,' a 'Conservative race,' or even a 'Communist race.' Why not?
I think better a minimum threshold for legal status to enjoy state-recognized rights that all 'religions' have to meet. One that is consistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Islam can't meet it.
If you come along and call Islam a cult, everyone will be angry and fight it. If you simply set a threshold that is the same for everyone - then Islam exposes itself, this educates the public and gains support for the measure.
At this point, the majority of the population still support the universal declaration of human rights. Wait to long, and that won't be the case.
You have hit the nail on the head Julie - it is the legal definition (or lack thereof) that needs to be addressed.
'Religion' is currently a 'protected' status whether a belief system is worthy, or not, and conveys privileges such as workplace accommodation, tax benefits and even government grants. Islam and sharia are inseparable (Koran 45:18) and sharia is totally incompatible with basic Western values such as equality before the law and freedom of religion. What's more, this is now being taught throughout the Western educational system - celebrating 'hijab' day in schools.
Unlike any other major religion Islam partially finances jihad through a mandatory Islamic tax called 'zakat' as a pillar of faith. Zakat is also raised in many other ways such as profits from the 'halal' industry and Islamic finance - with sharia boards, Sharia courts are popping up all over.
Western governments are enabling this.
This needs to be challenged.
Protected status is granted by the state, it is not a divine right. A legal definition, compatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - which Islam is not - would go a long way towards reversing the Islamization of the West.
People can believe what they want of course, but state benefits are something else altogether.
Western authorities seek advice regarding Islam from proponents of sharia. That will always result in the Islamization of the country. Demands for sharia are unending until a society is completely transformed.
I did a show with 'Act4Canada' about Islam in the workplace a while back that might interest you Tirri. There's a lot going on behind the scenes that authorities should be concerned about but instead, they're lining up to support it.
Good article, the cracks are showing, Islam is being exposed by non Muslims actually reading it, and ex Muslims speaking out. I thought the Quran was bad, but the Hadiths are so much worse.
I think I owe Christians an apology. Mohamed sure HATED infidels, and by extension his followers must as well, the doctrine is basically naked.
To say islam is about peace betrays a deep ignorance, or deep duplicity.
Is it possible to be both, I wonder.
Any, keep it up. I will subscribe this substack. This is going to become extra relevant down the line.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this Mystic. Deep ignorance and deep duplicity - but today, we have improved literacy, availability of quality translations in several languages (albeit bowdlerized to some extent and limited - much has not been translated) and electronic communication. It is this open access that necessitated an 'Islamophobia' strategy to silence people. It won't work.
The doctrine is the Achilles heel of Islam, it gives license to indefensible abuse of both Muslims and non-Muslims—the more we talk about it, the better.
Very true Eddie. That is exactly what the doctrine fosters because each can claim that the other is not following the doctrine as they should and fight them. Even on an individual basis, the doctrine provides a convenient weapon. A gripe with a neighbour - just accuse them of blasphemy and that will take care of it. There are countless examples of people being attacked by mobs, brutally murdered and killed. Islamic states frequently enforce horrendously long jail terms and death penalties for 'blasphemy' or other infractions (drinking alcohol, no hijab etc): https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/2/29/pakistan-when-a-blasphemy-accusation-is-evidence-the-sentence-often-death
The most obvious example are the Sunni and Shia but it is far from the only one.
Other belief systems also have schisms, only Islamic texts provide explicit justifications for killing when it is expedient - and at the same time assert that those doing the killing have the moral high ground - with no guilt.
Koran 8:17 'And you did not kill them, but it was Allah who killed them. And you did not throw when you threw, but it was Allah who threw, that He might test the believers with a good test. Indeed, Allah is Hearing and Knowing.'
Not to mention the obvious benefits for the avaricious, as found in Chapter 8 of the Koran, 'The Spoils of War.' It's odd to me that knowing all this, or they should know all this, that Western authorities are facilitating the expansion of sharia in non-Islamic states. If this keeps up, there will be no place left for anyone to escape it.
This isn't about people Gary, it's about doctrine, and so long as the doctrine gets a pass it will keep on promoting hatred and division. This could be stopped if we had leaders with the courage to do so.
You might want to read the conclusion in this article to find out how and then pass it on to people with the ability to help make it happen:
The UN has a lot to answer for but probably won't.
https://perspectivesonislam.substack.com/p/what-happens-when-declarations-of
The radical differences between the Islam cult and other religions needs to be taught at western schools . The next generations need to understand that this is an aggressive, cancerous , perverted cult that needs to be controlled and isolated . Future generations need to instruct muslims that they need to give allegiance to the country they reside in - if they prefer to commit to sharia they must leave .
Thanks for the comment Jeremy.
'Those who fail to learn from the past, are condemned to repeat it...' George Santayana
Islam means death
It means to submit, or surrender. Peace through surrendering. Not a chance.
One of the most immediate things which should be done is to ban Halal.
That is a lot more than food though Paul, that's halal vacations, nail polish, finance, clothing etc - it's an enormous industry at this point and it all contributes to zakat, hence to jihad and Islamization of the West
I know Elaine. I read the labels on things which I purchase and if the word halal appears then I don’t buy it or any of that company’s other products.
Halal butchery is barbaric.
Exactly. Islam is not a race. It's a delusion, for its believers and those that tolerate it.
It's interesting that as soon as someone becomes an 'ex-Muslim,' neither Islamic nor Western authorities consider them Muslim or take their warnings seriously. This implies that 'race' is effectively defined by adherence to and practice of sharia—a political and legal ideology.
By this logic, we could just as easily talk about a 'Liberal race,' a 'Conservative race,' or even a 'Communist race.' Why not?
The West needs to define Islam as a cult and proceed accordingly. No accommodation, no tolerance if bard behaviour, no oppression of women.
I think better a minimum threshold for legal status to enjoy state-recognized rights that all 'religions' have to meet. One that is consistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Islam can't meet it.
If you come along and call Islam a cult, everyone will be angry and fight it. If you simply set a threshold that is the same for everyone - then Islam exposes itself, this educates the public and gains support for the measure.
At this point, the majority of the population still support the universal declaration of human rights. Wait to long, and that won't be the case.
You have hit the nail on the head Julie - it is the legal definition (or lack thereof) that needs to be addressed.
'Religion' is currently a 'protected' status whether a belief system is worthy, or not, and conveys privileges such as workplace accommodation, tax benefits and even government grants. Islam and sharia are inseparable (Koran 45:18) and sharia is totally incompatible with basic Western values such as equality before the law and freedom of religion. What's more, this is now being taught throughout the Western educational system - celebrating 'hijab' day in schools.
Unlike any other major religion Islam partially finances jihad through a mandatory Islamic tax called 'zakat' as a pillar of faith. Zakat is also raised in many other ways such as profits from the 'halal' industry and Islamic finance - with sharia boards, Sharia courts are popping up all over.
Western governments are enabling this.
This needs to be challenged.
Protected status is granted by the state, it is not a divine right. A legal definition, compatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - which Islam is not - would go a long way towards reversing the Islamization of the West.
People can believe what they want of course, but state benefits are something else altogether.
Thank you for re-stacking John! Much appreciated :)
I saw western women? cow towing to Islam. WTF is wrong with you?
Extremely naive virtue signalling - not only uninformed, also misinformed with eyes wide shut..
It’s about submission. Islam translates to “ Submission”
Just get rid of FCUCKING Islam from our societies.
Jews and Arabs descend from the same father. Two brothers fighting.
Islam can bloody well stay in the Middle East, its not doing anything helpful in North America
Western authorities seek advice regarding Islam from proponents of sharia. That will always result in the Islamization of the country. Demands for sharia are unending until a society is completely transformed.
I did a show with 'Act4Canada' about Islam in the workplace a while back that might interest you Tirri. There's a lot going on behind the scenes that authorities should be concerned about but instead, they're lining up to support it.
https://rumble.com/v6csrmv-stealth-jihad-in-the-workplace-with-tanya-gaw-and-elaine-ellinger-jan-22-20.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Good article, the cracks are showing, Islam is being exposed by non Muslims actually reading it, and ex Muslims speaking out. I thought the Quran was bad, but the Hadiths are so much worse.
I think I owe Christians an apology. Mohamed sure HATED infidels, and by extension his followers must as well, the doctrine is basically naked.
To say islam is about peace betrays a deep ignorance, or deep duplicity.
Is it possible to be both, I wonder.
Any, keep it up. I will subscribe this substack. This is going to become extra relevant down the line.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this Mystic. Deep ignorance and deep duplicity - but today, we have improved literacy, availability of quality translations in several languages (albeit bowdlerized to some extent and limited - much has not been translated) and electronic communication. It is this open access that necessitated an 'Islamophobia' strategy to silence people. It won't work.
The doctrine is the Achilles heel of Islam, it gives license to indefensible abuse of both Muslims and non-Muslims—the more we talk about it, the better.
It’s a terrorist religion.
It’s about tribalism. That’s why, if they didn’t have the Jews to fight against, they would kill each other.
Very true Eddie. That is exactly what the doctrine fosters because each can claim that the other is not following the doctrine as they should and fight them. Even on an individual basis, the doctrine provides a convenient weapon. A gripe with a neighbour - just accuse them of blasphemy and that will take care of it. There are countless examples of people being attacked by mobs, brutally murdered and killed. Islamic states frequently enforce horrendously long jail terms and death penalties for 'blasphemy' or other infractions (drinking alcohol, no hijab etc): https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/2/29/pakistan-when-a-blasphemy-accusation-is-evidence-the-sentence-often-death
The most obvious example are the Sunni and Shia but it is far from the only one.
Other belief systems also have schisms, only Islamic texts provide explicit justifications for killing when it is expedient - and at the same time assert that those doing the killing have the moral high ground - with no guilt.
Koran 8:17 'And you did not kill them, but it was Allah who killed them. And you did not throw when you threw, but it was Allah who threw, that He might test the believers with a good test. Indeed, Allah is Hearing and Knowing.'
Not to mention the obvious benefits for the avaricious, as found in Chapter 8 of the Koran, 'The Spoils of War.' It's odd to me that knowing all this, or they should know all this, that Western authorities are facilitating the expansion of sharia in non-Islamic states. If this keeps up, there will be no place left for anyone to escape it.
Wouldn't bother me a bit
Fuck these muslims
This isn't about people Gary, it's about doctrine, and so long as the doctrine gets a pass it will keep on promoting hatred and division. This could be stopped if we had leaders with the courage to do so.
You might want to read the conclusion in this article to find out how and then pass it on to people with the ability to help make it happen:
https://perspectivesonislam.substack.com/p/islam-is-inconsistent-with-the-us
Mother of God! We are f****!